Select Page

UMass A<span id="more-10283"></span>mherst Releases Greatest Gambling Learn In US History

A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is thought to be the largest in US history.

Gambling is definitely an topic that is important Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two big resort casinos next few years.

In advance of that video gaming expansion, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a research that gives a baseline for their state of gambling into the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies.

The analysis, which comes from the educational school of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.

That is sufficient to produce it the largest gambling study ever completed in america.

Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies

The study ended up being praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated that it should provide an objective way to understand how the state is being impacted by gambling going forward.

‘The most crucial point is that we are establishing baseline conditions for every socio and economic variable that would be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our researchers will then track changes in those variables throughout the entire life of the casinos in purchase to know to a certainty the consequences and also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for just about any potential negative consequences.’

The study was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.

The result was a wealth of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.

For example, it turns out that about 72 percent of respondents reported gambling at least one time throughout the past year.

Most Massachusetts residents (about 60 percent) said they played the lottery, while 22 % reported that they’d gone to a casino during the year that is past.

Residents Like Casinos, However Locally

One hot topic in the spot was how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are directly to worry: 65 percent of these Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a percentage which should go way down when the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.

The study also investigated how residents feel about the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or over to three casinos that are full-scale. The answer was the one that is heard in many communities throughout the continuing state: not within my backyard.

A very good 59 % most of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have a impact that is neutral be beneficial to the state.

Nonetheless, 46 percent believe that gambling expansion is harmful within their very own community, while just 28 % trust casino expansion would be beneficial locally.

The research additionally discovered that illegal gambling was fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the past year, while two % reporting gambling on unregulated Web gaming internet sites.

More in-depth analysis of this data gathered is expected to be released in the months to come. However, principal detective Rachel Volberg claims that the real value in this study had been collecting information before views could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.

‘Not many people realize just how uncommon it is for the problem survey that is gambling be completed before some new kind of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg stated. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission so clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’

Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA

FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now concluded that FIFA doesn’t share the fundamental values regarding the law casino-online-australia.net enforcement community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)

Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to invest in a joint anti-match-fixing program.

The 10-year Integrity in Sport initiative was made to stamp down fixed games orchestrated by criminal gambling syndicates, but Interpol stated this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.

‘In light of the current context surrounding FIFA, while Interpol is still committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have decided to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All partners that are external whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and concepts of the organization, aswell as those of the wider law enforcement community.’

The terms and conditions associated with deal, signed last year, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible utilizing the concepts, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following the arrest of seven FIFA officials because the outcome of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not kept up its end of the bargain.

Why Now?

It begs the question, though, why had been Interpol, having its access that is wide-reaching to expansive network of law enforcement agencies, unaware of FIFA corruption in 2011?

The press that is british crying foul as far right back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The Key World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The name claims it all.

Also in 2006, Panorama, a BBC present affairs system, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper over a FIFA bribery scandal.

The former chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’ in it, Lord Triesman,

Swiss Humor

A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he don’t.

Interpol’s willingness to bury its mind in the sand may have been more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than 25 % of its annual budget.

Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the US, the only country that dared to contain the organization to task, it was too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.

On a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss television this week, and think us, it’s a zinger!

‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a car,’ grinned De Gregorio.

‘But that is driving?’ he quizzed.

‘The police,’ he zinged.

Fleetingly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had selected to ‘relinquish his office.’

Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.

Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million check that is dud when Ritz staff attempted to cash it the time after his gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)

The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss more than a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.

Based on the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury published out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it turned into a dud whenever casino tried to bank it the following morning.

The Ritz can be looking for an additional £200,000 ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.

It has been reported that the casino, which can be owned by reclusive billionaire identical twins, Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a series of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively in the courts.

In line with the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last 12 months alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).

Al-Daher Case

Al Geabury’s defense is which he is a gambling addict and his staff needs to have known this and stopped him from playing.

He wishes the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won a similar tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife associated with Omani minister that is foreign.

The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a couple of hours. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her debt. She quickly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.

Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a casino game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made alert to her gambling addiction, and even allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was unlawful.

She also said that the casino was indeed under a ‘duty of care’ it had failed to fulfill towards her, a responsibility which.

Psychiatric Reports

Nevertheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her see to the Ritz.

The judge said he had been certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to keep on gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have been eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very most likely during her stay in London during the days or months after 3 April 2012. in ruling in favor for the casino’

The judge in the Al Geabury case, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, stated at a hearing that is preliminary psychiatric reports have already been commissioned to evaluate Al Geabury’s state of brain on the time he lost the money and whether he had been in charge of their actions.

‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury has a gambling addiction therefore the claimant’s knowledge of that,’ she said.