MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, much easier to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as prone to find employment…..
PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students can change their advanced schooling course while at uni….
Lots of people think that it is simpler to learn something in a combined group in place of individually. Can you agree or disagree?
Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has many advantages
Elements of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some individuals think that children needs to do organised activities in their time that is free while believe that children should be liberated to do what they want to complete in their leisure time. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent tests also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it would be unfair for this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to get
-furthermore studies also show that the mind operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many people say that globalisation and the growing wide range of multinational companies have a negative influence on the environment. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your situation.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…
Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy in their lives that are daily. However, many people never have changed the real way they live. Why do custom writings you believe lots of people have not taken action that is individual? What could be done to encourage them to do something?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of the commons
– Collective problem – more straightforward to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What might be done to cause them to become do something?
– Media campaigns by the government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……
Some believe that may be the responsibility of individuals to manage the surroundings. Others say it’s the national government which should take care of this environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Paragraph 1
People should look after environmental surroundings because:
We are the consumers, we vote with your wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Paragraph 2
Government should take care of the environmental surroundings because:
they will have the capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians of the country, this means collectively they are guardians of this earth… but not true the truth is
Conclusion
Both should really be doing more!
In many countries small shops and town centers are getting out of business, because people have a tendency to drive towards the large stores that are out-of-town. This leads to a rise in car use, plus it means that people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores. Do you think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?
Recent Comments